It seems it is going to the right direction. I think it's great that there is certain variation you can provide in terms of vertical layering, it doesn't mean it needs to be really different everywhere - we still need to come back to very basic question - do we want varied, random spacing or all even spacing for horizontal layers? After we've got enough technical solutions for both choices, we sill need to question ourselves and make choice - that's the most important process of design. Spacing being even or random seems to be one of the most critical issue for the project - I expect further discussion among you guys. I guess the spherical joint system can also provide the same technical solution which would bring up the same question - please discuss among you guys and purify your tectonics/theory which fist the best for this project.
On the other hand, the horizontal joint between plywood shown here seems a bit technically troublesome. The joint piece will be holding the most fragile part of plywood, and actually it is not really grabbing where the joint piece has the strongest hold. And also, you should still try to coordinate with the vertical joint (no matter if it would be square or spherical) to contain certain similar nature in shape and tectonic system. It seems simply two different species now, and also functionally not really promising - I guess you guys may need to come up with more improvement for horizontal joint.
In general, it seems pretty close to good level of coordination - try to push one or two steps further.
1 comment:
It seems it is going to the right direction. I think it's great that there is certain variation you can provide in terms of vertical layering, it doesn't mean it needs to be really different everywhere - we still need to come back to very basic question - do we want varied, random spacing or all even spacing for horizontal layers? After we've got enough technical solutions for both choices, we sill need to question ourselves and make choice - that's the most important process of design. Spacing being even or random seems to be one of the most critical issue for the project - I expect further discussion among you guys.
I guess the spherical joint system can also provide the same technical solution which would bring up the same question - please discuss among you guys and purify your tectonics/theory which fist the best for this project.
On the other hand, the horizontal joint between plywood shown here seems a bit technically troublesome. The joint piece will be holding the most fragile part of plywood, and actually it is not really grabbing where the joint piece has the strongest hold. And also, you should still try to coordinate with the vertical joint (no matter if it would be square or spherical) to contain certain similar nature in shape and tectonic system. It seems simply two different species now, and also functionally not really promising - I guess you guys may need to come up with more improvement for horizontal joint.
In general, it seems pretty close to good level of coordination - try to push one or two steps further.
Post a Comment