Saturday, March 12, 2011
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Monday, March 7, 2011
03/08/2011
1
2
3
random arrangement using rhino script .
next step is needed to find out where to extract.
picture1 using rhino script
picture2 sample arrangement of huge amount
picture3 sample arrangement extracting suitably
ランダムによって生成されたビットを配置した図を載せています。
ここからどうやって最終形態の空間を抽出するかを考えなければいけません。
同じレイヤを重ねていくべきなのか。。それとも全レイヤが違うべきなのか。
まずはここまで。
Sunday, March 6, 2011
i propose the overall composition.i have also written in this but the extraction for making final form will be more conceivable.
sorry for not making in 3D data. i'll try to make as soon as possible that can easier to understand the meaning of this.
sorry my sketch is kind a messy handwriting...
i'll explain more if there is something that cant be understood.
全体構成について考えました。
１．最初に起こした平面図をビットにしたものの数を数えます。
→図ではビットが集合した感じですけどなんら意味をもちません。
２．それぞれの色（＝機能）の比率を全体から割り出します。
→書いてある数字は適当に書いてあるだけ
３．アルゴリズムを使って、全部のビットをランダムに配置します
→アルファベットで書いてあるが、図１で書いてあるものと同じもの、
ただ模様書くの面倒でした
４．ランダムの配置されたビットたちの中から、全ての要素（ここではa-g）を含んでいる個所を抽出します。
そしてその選んだビットの塊に内部空間のためのＶＯＩＤを設ける。
→ここの抽出の仕方、もう少し検討。図では一か所だけどもしかしたら何か所もある
可能性も。
→四角のイメージ図で書きましたが、実際抽出の仕方でもっと変形できると思わ
れる。ビットのスケールとＶＯＩＤのスケールも検討。
５．高さ、各レイヤの幅をそれぞれの色（＝機能）によって変化させます
例；床の間＝１０枚のレイヤ、レイヤの幅は光を取り入れるために１００ｍｍピッチ
→上の例のように、最高の事を考えながらレイヤ幅を考えます。
そのレイヤ幅によってジョイントの大きさも変化させます。
→レイヤ幅を１００ｍｍ、１５０ｍｍ、３００ｍｍ等 割れる数値にすることで
隣り合ってるレイヤが違ったとしてもはめる事が可能
課題として、
１．上に書いてあるように４の抽出の仕方に検討が必要
２．抽出したものから内部空間をとる場合のスケール問題
３．ジョイント部分にもなる、穴をあける方法にも検討が必要
があると思います。
ですが、ランダムに配置させてからどうビットが配置されるかを試行して見えてくる形によって考えてもいいと思っています。できる限り早くにモデルとして目にみえる形になるように頑張ります。
ジョイント話
■本多さんのジョイントを前提に考えた提案です。その話で、上下をずらしながらジョイント材をつなげていけば水平ジョイントはいらないのではないかという考えでしたが、今の案で行くと上下では同じ形のものが重なります。そこの考え方に何かアイデアあったらよろしくお願いします。
■ジョイントの種類をランダムに配置するのではなく、機能と同じようにまとめてしまう事で、角度を変えて展示する事による見え方の変化が考えられるではないでしょうか。
また説明不足だったり、理解しきれない部分があったら説明します。
Saturday, March 5, 2011
Friday, March 4, 2011
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
design development of group X
From minori's work and ioanna's introduction of negative/positive projects, I made one idea.
The idea is, to make negative spaces change in each sheet, drawn in right part, which is partially inspired ESCHER pattern.
And for TRANSFORMATION, I think we can change the arrangement of sheets, when we construct it.
Sunday, February 27, 2011
proposal 28/02/2011
this proposal might be some kinds of rules
to construct the general form.
keisuke's sketch(uploaded last time) helped
me make this proposal.
the bit was written in rectangle,but it can be any kind of shapes ,and that might make more interesting form.
形状構成の条件設定の手助けになる提案かと思います。
これは豊田さんが前回挙げたスケッチが基になっています。
１つのビットが今回は四角で構成されていますが、変形することでもっと面白い形状になるかと思います。
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Negative Space Project
The last comment by Naruki about negative space reminded me of this project, Mafoombey Acoustic Space by Martii Kalliala & Esa Ruskeepaa Mafoombey Acoustic Space – Martti Kalliala & Esa RuskeepääIt is quite a fun project, keeping a cube in the outside and a more organic shape in the inside. The disadvantages of this project though is that it uses an excessive amount of cardboard and there is really no transformability.
Friday, February 25, 2011
Pushing Volume to its Edge
http://elif-erdine.com/?p=40This image can be a good reference for Group X, to make its whole space composition.
When we use square for its outline as Minori proposed in the first phase, we have to make negative(void) space in it. This case, the letter "X" is negative space, and we can sit there and enjoy tea ceremony.
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
FRACTAL
Concerning the fractal in the sheets of my report, I want to add some theoretical ideas.
The fractal pattern is made of the same forms (ex. triangle, square etc...) , but just the size is different.
If we use triangle, it it like a Sierpinski Triangle（http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_triangle）which is used in the sunshade shown in my first sheet.
When you use squares, you'll get a Sierpinski Carpet（http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_carpet） which is used in the Menger Sponge（http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menger_sponge）and the Photonic Fractal shown in my second sheet.
In both, and generally speaking the fractal pattern can be get by dividing a big form in the same algorithm.
The fractal pattern is made of the same forms (ex. triangle, square etc...) , but just the size is different.
If we use triangle, it it like a Sierpinski Triangle（http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_triangle）which is used in the sunshade shown in my first sheet.
When you use squares, you'll get a Sierpinski Carpet（http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_carpet） which is used in the Menger Sponge（http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menger_sponge）and the Photonic Fractal shown in my second sheet.
In both, and generally speaking the fractal pattern can be get by dividing a big form in the same algorithm.
We'll can also use this pattern or concept to make cutting patterns, the whole space concept etc...
Could you give me some ideas concerning this issue?
ESCHER
With Mr. Toyoda's advice, and after the discussion among 4 Japanese students, I suppose ESCHER's work might give us some inspirations, as cutting patterns.
In this project, as we heard from tutors, we don't have to make many uniform patterns, but each of them can be varied, and in a sheet, positive/negative patterns of each jointing parts can be change gradually, for example from simple to complex or small to large etc...
What do you think of this idea?
Monday, February 21, 2011
week 2 Comments
Dear members,
Good works! We are pleased to see your ideas are coming. Potentially this week is going to be the last week so be ready.. Following are some comments for this week. They are divided into three groups but I would suggest everybody to read all the comments since everything is related to what you are doing right now. Please remember to have many discussion as possible within groups and within team. And post your proposal to the blog (as much as possible) till this weekend.
[Group X]
It's good that you now have the idea what the basic elements for teahouse are. Now that you know what you would need to make teahouse you really need to come up with compositional system for making space and how you are going to apply the research idea from group Z and joinery detail from team Y using the system you have come up with. You should first focus on group Z's research result to see which existing system seems to suits best for this project. In order to do that you have to have a close discussion with Naruki in group Z asap so that you can get the theoritical / mathematical idea and potential of that system. Then what you could do next is to pick up some segments of that system which coud have a potential to be a teahouse. In other words if you pick up different segment it could be not just teahouse but for exapmles it could be bathroom, dog house, garage...etc. Please see the attached sketch for your reference as an example. You really need to consider that all groups idea has to be combined into one piece till this weekend.
Also you need to come up with how you are going to have transforming. It is also a issue for joinery detail so you need to make a discussion with group Y about this.
for your reference:
Conway's Game of Life http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life
Patch Dynamics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patch_dynamics
Cellular Automata http://www.stephenwolfram.com/publications/articles/ca/
Swarm Intelligence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swarm_intelligence
[Group Y]
The mounting solutions you have shown are simple which is great. And the example you show (longitudinal joint) is great in terms of interlocking system. It might be hard to apply exactly the same system to this project but If you could apply the idea of this interlocking system to your base idea that'll be much better in terms of structural issue and composition.
Since you have to apply this joinery system to group X's teahouse composition, you have to have some discussions with group X so that you can brush up the detail. Each joinery could be uniformed, it could have several types or sizes of joinery, or each joinery detail could be different. Please also discuss about the tranformation with group X how you could use this joinery without any waste when transformed.
Please remember that joinery details are most crucial when actually constructing the structure so you need to come up with several options so that you can test them with the lasercut mock-ups. And please be reminded that the cutting result of usign lasercutter and CNC router is different. For example you need to set some tolerance for your cutting line in CAD when you are doing cut with the lasercutter since the laser it self has some thickness. It is possible to have cut with square edges with lasercutter but you got curved edge if you used CNC router. If any of you in this team (including members in team X and Z) have any experience using lasercutter or CNC router please share the information with others what you need to be careful about using those machines.
[Group Z]
I see that you have done a research on fractal system which is a good start. Though, just showing visual images what it looks like or how it's been used isn't enough if group X and group Y really wanted to use what you have found out other than presentation. You have to show several system (things like I have listed above) with it's spatial rules (diagrams, calculating formula, computational expression using something like processing...etc), You have to show how you can deform its space with what kind of parameters. And this has to be done really quick at least in two days so that members can refer to it. Please try to have as much discussion as possible with other groups with what you have got to share the details.
Junichiro+Keisuke
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Research
System concept
提案です。コンセプトとして日本建築の奥ゆかしさを構造体の解像度で表すという
のはどうですか。コンセプト「解像度」です.
Is proposed. Resolution of the structure that represents
the depth of Japanese architecture as a concept is how
about you? Concept of "resolution" is.
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)